Fullscreen

Forum Views - July 2023

Welcome to interactive presentation, created with Publuu. Enjoy the reading!

BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE BROKERS' FORUM (BBF) | MUMBAI, INDIA

JULY 2023 | VOLUME: 12 • ISSUE NO. 4 •

DR. ROGER

MOSER

ALEXANDER

BRUNNER

SEGUN

COLE

AVNEET

KOHLI

RICHA

PATIL

TARUNA

AGGARWAL

AVINASH

SHERE

DEVEN

PADHYA

DR. PRASAD

KAPRE

PRAGGATTI

RAO

NISHA

ANAND

SONIA

PARDESI

• AI and Skill Development in India • The Impact of Learning (& Unlearning) on your Organization’s Growth?

• Principles for Optimal Hydration

Cyber Liability for Stockbrokers • SEBI Informal Guidance Scheme Importance of Credit Score in the Indian Lending Industry

&more

INSIDE

• Decision Intelligence Cube

• Pioneering Swiss Digital Asset

Custody • Rise of African Unicorns

• Unleashing the Economic Potential of Women

in Business • World of Augmented Reality (AR) and

Virtual Reality (VR) • Well-being Coaching • CUSPA

Transactions by TM / CM • Retirement Fund

Management • Diamond World • Psychology of

Errors in our Thinking • Inspiring Greatness

through Empathy and Collaboration

• Emotionally Intelligent or

Intelligently Emotional?

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS

BOMBAY STOCK EXCHANGE BROKERS’ FORUM (BBF)

GOVERNING BOARD 2022 - 23

Anup Gupta

Sykes & Ray

Equities India Ltd.

Cyrus Khambata

Paytm

Money Ltd.

Madhavi Vora

ULJK Securities

Pvt. Ltd.

Naresh Rana

Vishwas Fincap

Services Pvt. Ltd.

Neeraj Choksi

NJ India

Invest Pvt. Ltd.

Nirav Gandhi

JM Financial

Services Ltd.

Nithin Kamath

Zerodha

Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Ajit Sanghvi

MSS Securities

Pvt. Ltd.

Parth Nyati

Swastika

Investmart Ltd.

S. P. Toshniwal

Sunlight

Broking LLP

HEMANT MAJETHIA

Vice Chairman | BBF

Ventura

Securities Ltd.

LALIT MUNDRA

Chairman | BBF

Suresh Rathi

Securities Pvt. Ltd.

HARIN MEHTA

Treasurer | BBF

M/S. V. C.

Mehta

KUSHAL A. SHAH

Jt. Secretary | BBF

Ratnakar

Securities Pvt. Ltd.

KISHOR KANSAGRA

Secretary | BBF

Pragya

Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Anurag Bansal

SMC Global

Securities Ltd.

Ashish Rathi

HDFC

Securities Ltd.

Dr. Pravin Bathe

Angel One Ltd.

Purav Fozdar

Axiom Share

Broking Pvt. Ltd.

Vivek Gupta

GEPL Capital

Pvt. Ltd.

Virender Mansukhani

Mansukh Securities

and Finance Ltd.

Uttam Bagri

BCB Brokerage

Pvt. Ltd.

Tejas Khoday

Fyers Securities

Pvt. Ltd.

Saurabh Jain

SSJ Finance &

Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Roopkishor Bhootra

Anand Rathi Shares &

Stock Brokers Ltd.

Santosh Jayaram

GROWW

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

Dr. Vispi Rusi Bhathena, PhD (h.c.)

Chief Executive Officer

Dr. V. Aditya Srinivas

Chief Operating Officer

and Chief Economist

FORUM VIEWS, JULY 2023 edition

Indian economy emerging strong on all fronts

The Indian macro-economic data seems to be becoming stronger. The GDP which has come to 6.1%

for Q4 which was 4.4% in Q3 has been a quite cheer; and the whole year GDP is at 7.2% which was

much better than expected. This means that the broad economy is on the path to recovery and

becoming stronger.

FROM

THE

BBF SECRETARIAT

Inflation CPI data is at 4.70% which earlier was at 5.66%. This is below the RBI mark of 6% which has

given RBI room to put the Repo Rate hike at pause. RBI for the second consecutive time has kept the

Repo rate constant at 6.5%, but has cautioned that it needs to watch the monsoon since El Nino may

cause less rainfall.

The Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) have been steadily putting money into the markets and have

invested Rs. 42,684 crores till date in 2023 and the Mutual Funds have invested Rs. 55000 crores. The

return of FIIs have ensured that the markets are slowly rising to the all-time high levels and the mutual

fund SIP flows of Rs. 14,000 crores show the confidence of the retail investors in the Indian economy and

growth story.

The global economies are also taking time to adjust to the high interest rate scenario as the interest

rates in US, Europe and UK have reached the terminal level. The inflation in the developed economies

once starts coming down then the rate cut cycle may also start sooner or later this year.

From

to You...

BBF

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

BBF conducted OVER 30 SEMINARS towards investor education and awareness

initiatives which were attended by MORE THAN 1600 participants.

BBF presence at the SEBI@35: Reflect, Review & Renew meeting held on Wednesday, 31-May 2023 at SEBI, Mumbai

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

Disclaimer: This magazine is meant for information purposes only and does not constitute any opinion or guidelines or recommendation on any course of action to be followed by the reader(s). It is not intended to be used as trading or

investment advice by anybody and should not in any way be treated as a recommendation. The information contained in this magazine does not constitute or form part of and should not be construed as, any offer for purchase or sale of

any product or service. While the information in the magazine has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith, readers may note that the contents thereof including text, graphics, links or other items are

provided without warranties of any kind. Bombay Stock Exchange Brokers' Forum (BBF) expressly disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, correctness, reliability, timeliness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose, of

this magazine. Bombay Stock Exchange Brokers' Forum (BBF) shall also not be liable for any damage or loss of any kind, howsoever caused as a result (direct or indirect) of the use of the information or data contained in this magazine.

Any alteration, transmission, photocopied distribution in part or in whole or reproduction of any form of this magazine or any part thereof without prior consent of Bombay Stock Exchange Brokers' Forum (BBF) is prohibited.

Concept, production and editorial: Dr. VISPI RUSI BHATHENA, PhD (h.c.)

Editor: Dr. V. ADITYA SRINIVAS

Design & Layout: HARSHAD GAJERA

Printer: KSHITIJ PRINTERS, 49, Parsi Panchayat Road, Ashok Ind. Estate, 1st Floor,

Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 069

Write to us: We would be happy to hear from you! Do send in your suggestions, feedback and comments

via email to team@brokersforumofindia.com | Visit us: www.brokersforumofindia.com

BBF Steering Committee

(Chairman)

(Vice-Chairman)

(Secretary)

(Treasurer)

(Jt. Secretary)

Lalit Mundra

Hemant Majethia

Kishor Kansagra

Harin Mehta

Kushal A. Shah

Follow us on:

@bbfindia

/bbfindia

/Bsebrokersforum

/bbfindia

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

08

Global

Insights

BETTER PERFORMANCE WITH THE

DECISION INTELLIGENCE CUBE

25

Your

Questions

Answered

CUSPA TRANSACTIONS BY TM / CM

PIONEERING SWISS DIGITAL

ASSET CUSTODY

THE RISE OF AFRICAN UNICORNS:

EXPLORING AFRICA'S THRIVING

STARTUP ECOSYSTEM AND ITS

GLOBAL IMPACT

UNLEASHING THE ECONOMIC

POTENTIAL OF WOMEN IN

BUSINESS: A PATH TO

PROFITABILITY

AN EXPLAINER ON APPLE

VISION PRO: COST-BENEFIT

ANALYSIS AND THE FUTURE OF VR

WELL-BEING COACHING: THE KEY

TO AN EFFECTIVE WORKFORCE

THE IMPACT OF LEARNING

(& UNLEARNING) ON YOUR

ORGANIZATION’S GROWTH?

CYBER LIABILITY

FOR STOCKBROKERS

GUIDING THROUGH UNCERTAINTY:

SEBI INFORMAL GUIDENCE SCHEME

IFSC FUND (SERIES 12)

32 Insights

THE IMPORTANCE OF

CREDIT SCORE IN THE

INDIAN LENDING INDUSTRY

FROM PASSIVE TO ACTIVE:

THE NEED OF THE HOUR

IN RETIREMENT

FUND MANAGEMENT

COMPLIANCE CALENDAR

47

Regulatory

Compliance

THE PROBLEM WITH OUR THINKING - THE PSYCHOLOGY

OF ERRORS IN OUR THINKING

HUMBLE LEADERSHIP: INSPIRING GREATNESS THROUGH

EMPATHY AND COLLABORATION

ARE YOU EMOTIONALLY INTELLIGENT

OR INTELLIGENTLY EMOTIONAL?

ENHANCING WELL-BEING AND PERFORMANCE:

AYURVEDIC PRINCIPLES FOR OPTIMAL HYDRATION

SPIRULINA - THE GREEN MARVEL

Leadership,

Empowerment & Lifestyle

48

60

Living

Health

Matters

DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS)

IMPROVES SYMPTOMS OF ADVANCED

PARKINSON’S DISEASE - HELPS PATIENTS

REGAIN QUALITY OF LIFE

36 Feature

ROCKS THAT’S ROCKING

THE DIAMOND WORLD!

AI AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT

IN INDIA: AN OVERVIEW

CONTRACT OF PLEDGE

UNDER INDIAN CONTRACT ACT

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

Global

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

Decisions: The obvious yet mostly neglected performance

indicator

In today's fast-paced und often highly uncertain business

environment, making effective decisions is crucial for leaders

and their companies to stay competitive. More than a decade

ago, a study by Bain among 800 international companies

showed that the quality of decisions of executives and their

companies' financial results correlate at a 95per cent

confidence level for every country, industry and company size

they studied. What is interesting for any investor is that the

top-quintile companies with respect to the quality of their

decision-making generated on average total shareholder

returns nearly 6 percentage points higher than those of other

companies.

Consequently, financial investors are well-advised that when

they analyze the reorganization plans of CEOs and their

companies, they put much more focus on whether these plans

enable optimal decision-making processes rather than their

impact on classic organizational structures along products or

markets. Since Bain’s original study, more research has

confirmed that any organizational structure or reorganization

can be completely dysfunctional if it is not aligned with the

required decision-making processes on operational, tactical

and strategic levels. But how can you assess a company’s

professional approach to decision-making?

Solid decision-making is a complex process influenced by

various factors, including high-quality information, human

biases, different opinions, and the need for consensus among

decision-makers. Organizations are increasingly turning to the

concept of Decision Intelligence (DI) to navigate these

challenges and improve decision outcomes.

In short, Decision Intelligence is a holistic approach to

decision-making that combines human judgment, big data

analysis, and technological advancements. Companies like

Google, IBM, Deloitte, Cognizant or SatSure recognize the

significance of DI and have incorporated it into their operations

and the solutions for their clients. SatSure, for example,

leverages ‘Decision Intelligence from Space’ to support banks

in India along the entire agriculture loan cycle for farmers or the

planning and financing of infrastructure projects.

Decision Intelligence: The new boy/girl in town

Insights

BETTER PERFORMANCE

WITH THE DECISION INTELLIGENCE CUBE

Dr. Roger Moser

Chairman,

SatSure

Senior Lecturer

Macquarie University

In addition, Gartner Group has recently identified Decision

Intelligence to be at the Innovation Trigger of the Hype Cycle

for Emerging Technologies in Finance. For Gartner, DI is a

practical discipline used to improve decision-making by

explicitly understanding and engineering how decisions are

made, and how outcomes are evaluated, managed and

improved via feedback.

The Decision Intelligence Cube (DI-Cube) is a work-in-progress

concept that we at SatSure have developed when helping

executives and companies to analyze their decision-making

behaviour, attitude, and structures (Exhibit 1). The DI-Cube

consists of three dimensions to understand a company’s

decision-making from a holistic view:

Understanding the decision-making approach of a

company from a holistic perspective: The Decision

Intelligence Cube

Solid decision-making is a complex

process influenced by various factors,

including high-quality information,

human biases, different opinions, and

the need for consensus among

decision-makers. Organizations are

increasingly turning to the concept of

Decision Intelligence (DI) to navigate

these challenges and improve decision

outcomes.

(Sydney, New South Wales, Australia)

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

The y-axis of the DI-CUBE is probably the most

underestimated aspect of successful decision-making. Based

on my experience working with executives and several

research projects, I believe that this aspect is currently the

most underrated factor of good decision-making at companies

because you can neither just buy a piece of software and

automate it nor do executives often invest the time it requires

to deal with it.

• Are structures & processes in place that allow for

identifying dissent among stakeholders regarding relevant

facts and assumptions / the interpretation of the

intelligence gathered? Are they effective?

• Are structures & processes in place to deal with dissent

and increase the level of consensus among the relevant

stakeholders of a decision? Are they effective?

• Are principles established that help decision-makers to

decide when to ‘ignore’ disagreement among the

stakeholders of a decision? Are they accepted?

Finally, the z-axis is probably the most difficult to evaluate and

change. It covers assessing how executives or organizations

prioritize the relevant facts and essential assumptions to base

their decisions on and how they deal with dissent within or

outside the organization.

What does this mean? Well, there are some decisions where

you don't require any dissent assessment because the

required facts & figures or assumptions that matter are well

accepted by all major stakeholders (e.g., criteria to evaluate a

customer along a KYC process etc.). These kinds of decisions

can be made based on rational assessments with no cognitive

preferences (biases).

Possible Assessment Questions:

Z-Axis (PREFERENCE Dimension):

Exhibit 1: Decision Intelligence CUBE

X-Axis (INTELLIGENCE Dimension):

Possible Assessment Questions:

Y-Axis (DISSENT Dimension):

When analyzing an executive's or an organization's decision-

making behaviour and structures, we first assess how facts

are gathered, assumptions are developed, and uncertainty is

dealt with. In our experience, many companies are today well

organized to gather facts & figures but have no consistent

approach to develop and test assumptions, let alone

established intelligence acquisition processes when dealing

with uncertainty. Based on this assessment, we then identify

opportunities to improve a company's intelligence-gathering

processes when preparing decisions.

• Are our decision-makers framework-proficient enough to

select the right frameworks and models?

• Do we invest in the right technologies to gather and

process intelligence?

• How do we develop assumptions about future

developments, and can we identify those developments

that genuinely affect our company's business model?

• Are we able to think in alternative business context

scenarios?

• Do we have principles in place when we face true

uncertainty?

Once we understand how executives or organizations gather

the intelligence they need, the next important dimension is

how they deal with DISSENT among executives along the

decision-making process. Dissent can happen with respect to

different conclusions from the intelligence gathered or what

kind of facts or assumptions are essential to decide in the first

place.

Source: Roger Moser

10

FORUM VIEWS - JULY 2023

Then there are many decisions where executives are actually

paid well to bring their interpretation of facts or conclusions

from assumptions to the table to finally make a call. These

kinds of decisions are based on the expertise, experience and

human creativity of executives (i.e., their cognitive diversity).

This is where we want informed opinions to avoid undesired

cognitive biases.

• What kind of structures & processes are in place to prevent

unwanted cognitive biases?

• Does the leadership have specific values or beliefs that

prevent selected decisions from being questioned by

stakeholders? Are these decisions likely to affect the

performance of the company?

Obviously, each of these three dimensions requires a much

more detailed assessment than what I have been able to offer

here, but my experience shows that these three dimensions

cover about 80% of what can go wrong along a well-designed

decision process - at the individual or organizational level.

Most importantly, the DI-Cube highlights that it is not only the

(big) data perspective (INTELLIGENCE dimension) that

matters (and where most of the current management or

investor attention goes to) but also how executives deal with

DISSENT, how they reflect on their IDEOLOGIES and how these

dimensions affect the quality of their decision processes.

In sum, Decision Intelligence as an approach and the DI-Cube

as a framework offer organizations a structured approach to

better decision-making, considering various factors such as

advanced technologies when gathering intelligence,

organizational behaviour when dealing with dissent, and

insights from neuroscience when fighting cognitive biases.

While data-driven approaches have been in focus for a while

and cognitive biases are often discussed in the context of

diversity & inclusion, investors and executives should pay

more attention to how organizations create consensus and

embrace dissent along the decision process. It empowers

organizations to navigate complexity, reduce biases, and

make more informed decisions contributing to their long-term

growth and financial prosperity.

Good decision-making isn't only about data. It's about

dealing with dissent and cognitive biases

Finally, some decisions are neither based on rational

assessments nor informed opinions but on different levels of

ideology. This kind of decision-making is very difficult to

change because it is strongly connected to the beliefs and

(cultural/personal) values of decision-makers. Such an

approach can be part of an organization's DNA (e.g., the

Catholic church) or the mission statement of a company (e.g.,

there is a large retailer in Switzerland which doesn't sell

alcohol in their shops based on the founder's 'mission

statement' - although it would be very profitable, and all

competitors are doing it). However, too much ideology can

negatively affect an organization's efforts to invest in the

gathering of facts or the development of reasonable and solid

assumptions as a basis for decision-making (i.e.,it negatively

affects the INTELLIGENCE dimension). The same logic applies

to such an organization's ability to deal with dissent (i.e.,it

negatively affects the DISSENT dimension).

• Is the leadership clear about what level and kind of biases

are acceptable to influence their organization’s decision-

making?

Possible Assessment Questions:

Dr. Roger Moser, a Swiss national living in Australia, serves as faculty at

Macquarie University, Australia, University of St.Gallen, Switzerland, and the

Indian Institute of Management in Udaipur. Dr. Moser also serves as Chairman of

the Board of Directors of SatSure AG - a Decision Intelligence from Space

Providerheadquartered in Bangalore. SatSure leverage advances in satellite

remote sensing, machine learning, big data analytics and cloud computing to

create products and solutions which help enterprises, including Indian banks and

infrastructure companies, and their people to make smarter decisions.

He is also a thought leader in Decision Intelligence and coaches executives in

improving their impact and performance through a combination of the latest

insights from managerial, social, natural and neuro-science. In the past, Dr.

Moser established the BMW-Endowed Chair at China-Europe International

Business School in Shanghai, China, and the Airbus-Endowed Chair at IIM

Bangalore. He also supported other MNCs such as Daimler Trucks in developing

their future business models in new market and technology developments.

Besides numerous academic publications, he is regularly publishing about

Decision Intelligence in his LinkedIn newsletter “Decision Model Innovation”.

1. https://www.bain.com/insights/decision-insights-1-score-your-organization/

2. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2022-11-28-gartner-

releases-first-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-in-finance

Decision Intelligence as an

approach and the DI-Cube as

a framework offer

organizations a structured

approach to better decision-

making, considering various

factors such as advanced

technologies when gathering

intelligence, organizational

behaviour when dealing with

dissent, and insights from

neuroscience when fighting

cognitive biases.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64