Fall 23 Newsletter Final Draft

Welcome to interactive presentation, created with Publuu. Enjoy the reading!

Rain? What Rain?

ometimes, solutions to large-scale prickly

problems are as close as home. That was the

message delivered by Doug Tallamy to the

100+ people attending his webinar Networks For

Life, Homegrown National Park (HNP) at the Gem

Theater on Saturday evening. Rather than focusing on

large-scale efforts, Tallamy insists our backyards can

be key players in addressing the significant decline

in songbird numbers. The keys to success include

reducing the size of your lawn and replacing it with

plants (primarily trees and shrubs) that support the

most caterpillars. Why caterpillars? Caterpillars

convert inedible leaves into tasty protein, a critical

nutrient for baby birds. More plants means more

caterpillars means more birds; it is as simple as that.

Richard Blanco was a special guest at the Annual

Meeting. His place-based poems were a perfect match

to our mission and set a beautiful tone for the day.

Despite off-and-on rain, the Monarch Festival was

a success. Over 500 attendees enjoyed touring the

garden, attending workshops, seeing and learning

about some of the odder insects that can be found in

Maine, and buying tickets for the raffle. New this year,

a hands-on indigo dyeing workshop was extremely

popular.

We are already planning for the 2024 festival. More

information will be coming soon.

The 2023 Monarch Festival Was A Great Success!

Eating the Elephant: A

Regional Approach to

Conservation-Based

Solutions p.2-3

Rain? What Rain? p.1

Come Celebrate Buck’s

Ledge Community Forest

Day p.7

MLT Board Welcomes

and Farewells p.6

The Question of Carbon

Sequestration p.4-5

Visitors enjoying the Habitat for All Garden, Photos by Brewster Burns

Mahoosuc Land Trust

Conserving the Mahoosuc Region since 1989

Fall 2023 Newsletter

Working with our

neighboring land trusts

Eatingtheelephant:

Erika Rowland, Executive Director 2019-2023, Greater Lovell Land Trust

A regional approach to

conservation-based solutions

and working together on coordinated action across the

million-acres that we collectively serve, we are focused

on regional resilience for the future. We are also working

individually on the particular needs for each organization.

In our greater Lovell service area in 2021 and again in 2022,

GLLT-led projects have received funding from the “Land

and Climate” grant program of the Open Space Institute

and Land Trust Alliance. The funding allows us to take

a regional look at critical conservation lands and land

management strategies that are key to supporting our natural

and human communities as we prepare for the future. We

are creating a response plan to address impacts and looking

for opportunities to build resilience and sustainability.

Facing Climate Change:

Mitigation and Adaptation

Climate change action comes in two flavors. There is

mitigation — reducing the amount of carbon and other

greenhouse gasses that are warming the planet’s atmosphere

and waters. And there is adaptation — changing and

adjusting what we do and how we think to better align

with the new conditions and impacts. Warming and related

changes are already happening all around us and new

threats seem to arrive daily. The changes that are affecting

our lives are also impacting the plants and animals that are

acclimated to climate conditions that have been relatively

constant for the last 500 years or more. The collaborative

land trust efforts are making headway on both fronts.

Conserving undeveloped lands is a key strategy. The leaves

of all plants take carbon out of the atmosphere to create the

sugars they use as energy and forests store carbon in tree

trunks, branches, and root systems, as well as in downed

wood and other debris on the forest floor that mixes deep

into the soils. Tree canopy and forest vegetation also slow

the surface flow of heavy rains, reducing the erosion and

damage caused by flooding. Western Maine land trusts

are engaging beyond our historic nature-based activities,

putting even greater focus on actionable climate solutions.

owadays when it rains in our part of western

Maine, it pours; and that’s not a figure of speech.

Last fall and into early winter we had a series of

heavy rains. GLLT trails that climb to summit vistas, like

Sabattus Mountain, became raging waterways that needed

repair and culverts in our towns were overwhelmed,

leaving gaping holes along many rural roads. Our rapidly

warming spring and fall seasons mean that ticks are

active through much of the year, giving us no break in the

need for tick-check diligence. And then there’s winter.

Recent winters have been hit or miss for serious snow

cover before mid-January, much to the dismay of skiers

and snowmobilers. The lakes are freezing later—ice-in

on Kezar came in mid-January in the deep bays this

year —and the Maine Warden Service had ice safety

warnings for fishing on many Maine lakes through

January. And spring? Late snow saved some of the ski

season, but who isn’t dreading a repeat of April and May

heatwaves in the 80s, early hatches of biting insects,

and then the weeks-long stretches of summer highs in

the 90s that have become the norm in recent years?

Goal: Community Resilience

There is no doubt that climate is affecting our local

weather and putting challenges on the human and

natural communities. But there is plenty of work being

done to protect our future, including new resources to

help individuals and communities to take action. Lovell,

Bridgton, Fryeburg, and Norway are a few area towns

taking part in the Maine Community Resilience Partnership

planning and applying for grant support as part of the

state’s “Maine Won’t Wait” Climate Action Plan. In our area,

our land trusts are also working to shape their work into a

direct response to challenges triggered by climate change.

GLLT and its western Maine neighbors, Loon Echo Land

Trust, Mahoosuc Land Trust, Western Foothills Land

Trust, and Upper Saco Valley Land Trust, are taking a

collaborative approach to climate change. By planning

Reprinted from the Greater Lovell Land Trust Spring 2023 Newsletter with permission

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Androscoggin River

Androscoggin River

Crooked River

Saco River

Swift River

Bethel

Rumford

Norway

Bridgton

M A I N E

N E W H A M P S H I R E

10

2.5

Miles´

Sebago Lake

Long Lake

Kezar

Lake

Fryeburg

Conway

Saco River

Lower

chards

Lake

Lovell

This map shows the general service area boundaries of the

GLLT and our neighboring land trusts. The yellow pathway

indicates the general location of a climate resilient conservation

corridor, a pathway that could provide largely uninterrupted

and connected habitat for movement of animals, birds,

insects, and plant life in response to changing conditions.

Working Together: Where do we Start?

In 2021, the five neighboring land trusts collaborated

to build a mapping tool using data from The Nature

Conservancy (TNC) analysis of Resilient and Connected

Landscapes in our combined service areas. The study

area stretches from Sebago Lake into the Mahoosuc

Range and other parts of the White Mountains. The TNC

analysis highlights largely undeveloped and connected

areas of land that have hills and mountain slopes (diverse

topography), water bodies, and ecologically-important

plant or animal communities. Wildlife has the best chance

to adjust in-place or by traveling through these resilient

and connected areas that allow for comfortable ranges

of temperature, rainfall tempered by forest lands, food

resources, and other needs as the habitat changes. Together,

the land trusts have identified such a corridor along

the boundaries of our collective service areas that links

undeveloped areas with existing and potential conservation

lands as a regional priority for future conservation.

On the Ground: Will Durkin, Field Naturalist

More recently, the land trust collective received grant

funds to hire a researcher — Will Durkin, Master’s degree

candidate from the University of Vermont’s Field Naturalist

Program — who will spend the summer on work to

integrate the known and anticipated effects of changing

climate conditions into the management of the thousands

of forestland acres we collectively conserve. Starting with

a few selected land trust holdings that represent a range

of forest types, and using a framework developed by the

USFS Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science (www.

niacs.org), Will plans to compile existing information and

conduct his own field work to identify tree species and

tree stand structures that may be best suited to withstand

drought, warming winters, insect pests, disease, and other

changing climate conditions. He will be advised by forest

climate adaptation specialists from UVM’s Silviculture and

Applied Forest Ecology Lab, as well as professional staff

from the five land trusts. With additional support from

a community conservation consultant, the land trusts

will also publish website content about the nature-based

solutions of our land trusts and other organizations.

Collaboration: The Best Way to Eat an Elephant

The issue of climate change reaches far beyond our region,

and far-reaching action is needed to raise an effective

response. Keeping lands open, connected, and forested

will reduce storm impacts and flooding, allow the animals,

plants, birds, and insects of the ecosystems to adjust to

the changes, and foster the capture and storage of carbon.

Resiliency and sustainability for the future is one of the

most important, mission-aligned tasks that land trusts

can tackle. Working collaboratively, we can take a more

significant bite out of the climate change elephant.

August 2023 Update: Five Land Trusts Funded for

Collaborative Climate Conservation Project

MLT and four partner land trusts have just received

foundation funding to escalate the pace of climate-informed

land protection projects in a 1.5 million-acre area stretching

from Sebago Lake to the Mount Washington Valley.

Building on earlier research the groups have done together,

the project will hone in on a Climate Resilient Focus Area

within their shared landscape. It will provide funding for

the critical start-up costs to conserve those areas that will be

the most critical for plant and animal habitat and humans

in the face of climate change, including a “climate corridor”

to provide habitat connectivity across the trusts’ combined

service areas. The partners are: Greater Lovell Land Trust,

Loon Echo Land Trust, Mahoosuc Land Trust, Upper Saco

Valley Land Trust, and Western Foothills Land Trust.

Editor’s Note: During Erika Rowland’s tenure as GLLT’s

Executive Director, she provided key leadership in

collaborative climate change work for peer conservation

organizations, including MLT. Erika now serves as Eastern

Programs Development Director for Forest Stewards Guild.

Big Tree, Small Trees: Forest Age and Carbon

Sequestration

orests play an important role in absorbing

carbon dioxide and fighting climate change.

Indeed, an artificial technology that sequesters

carbon on the scale of forest ecosystems does not exist.

That said, in the last few years I have heard discussions

and different opinions on what types of forests do it

best: older forests or younger forests.

Often this age classification is used analogously

to older forests on conserved lands versus younger

managed commercial forests. And many times these

arguments play out in support or not of commercial

logging or forest management as tools to fight climate

change. There are well established carbon monitoring

plots on forests of both types on federal or state or

local lands. Simple measurement and acquiring data

is not a problem in addressing this question. Rather,

digesting the volume of data and identifying solutions

specific to a geographic area can be daunting tasks.

I set out to dig into this research and emerge with

a whole picture and clear victor of the superior forest

for sequestering carbon and fighting climate change at

scale. That did not happen. However, I can report on

the general trends that emerged in this research and

some key takeaways for supporters of conservation.

Younger Forests Sequester Carbon Faster

More than once during my reading this was the

headline or cutting edge of an argument wholly in

support of commercial or managed forests as the

superior carbon sequestration tool. When assessed

tree for tree, an older tree of the same species will

absorb more carbon dioxide in a year than a younger

tree. This comes down to simple math, that the rate

of annual added individual tree mass increases as tree

size increases. This mass, in turn, is representative of

the carbon sequestered. Consider the diameter of the

100th growth ring against that of the 20th–in essence

it is the snowball effect, or, for the financial minds:

compounding interest.

And yes you’re right, this contradicts the initial

claim. But we do not consider (nor measure) forests

as individual trees. Instead, forests are measured by

area, the density of trees therein approximated, and

the resulting carbon budgets extrapolated from there.

That density (trunks per acre) is not a fixed number.

Generally speaking, it starts high and trends lower as a

forest ages. And this is the rub: while older individual

trees may absorb more carbon dioxide than younger

individual trees, there are fewer trees in a given area of

older forest versus a younger forest.

What is more, the majority of these older forests

occur on conserved lands where natural processes

are upheld and hands-on management minimized.

As such, after the behemoth trees die, they are left

to fall and rot in place, returning vital nutrients to

the soil and emitting carbon dioxide in the process.

Is harvesting the trees and keeping the carbon

sequestered in wood products the solution?

Most “Commercialized Carbon” doesn’t stay

Sequestered

Those in support of the climate benefits of

commercial forestry have much to say about the

ongoing carbon sequestration in wood products such

as furniture, lumber, or other building materials. The

unfortunate truth is that it is a long process from

tree to desk, with many steps almost all of them

resulting in a loss of the sequestered carbon back to

the atmosphere. Tree harvesting often leaves the root

mounds and tree tops in the forest to decompose

releasing carbon dioxide. Additionally, many wood

products are used in temporary applications and enter

the waste stream emitting carbon dioxide during

additional decomposition. The equipment necessary

for tree harvesting also creates carbon dioxide

emissions.

What About Carbon Out? NPP, GPP and the

Complete Carbon Budget

During photosynthesis trees absorb carbon dioxide

from the atmosphere, creating glucose molecules and

releasing oxygen – this is Gross Primary Productivity

(GPP). These same trees are also releasing carbon

dioxide at the same time, through a process called

respiration, as energy is consumed to replicate cells

to grow and maintain the organism. This difference

accounts for Net Primary Productivity (NPP). Trees

are not exempt from the cost of doing business.

Spenser Williams, MLT Land Steward

Obviously, the tree needs to absorb more carbon

dioxide than it releases to stay alive, and it therefore

has a positive NPP. What may seem a trivial detail

becomes a major accounting item when extrapolated

across an entire forest. These two items become the

basis for a more complex terrestrial carbon budget

(exempting ocean photosynthesis from algae and

carbon sequestration there). This carbon budget

likewise can take separate paths in older and younger

forests.

A Deeper Look

Soils store more carbon dioxide than all terrestrial

plants and earth’s atmosphere combined. Carbon

is sequestered into soils by plant growth and

decomposition, in part, by a process called fine root

turnover. Fine roots are the smallest of the plant,

where the actual water and nutrient absorption takes

place on a molecular level. These fine roots because of

their small size are susceptible to decay and predation.

Indeed, it is replacing these fine roots that accounts for

much of a tree’s maintenance and energy consumption

via respiration. It is the decay or turnover of these fine

roots that can move carbon from above ground to

below ground.

I found one study stating that the process of carbon

sequestration to soils is found to accelerate in trees

older than 100 years. What we do know is that the

carbon storage pool in soils is massive. And while

carbon accumulates in soils slowly, soils can release

huge amounts of carbon very quickly during intense or

widespread disturbances such as wildfire or land use

change (eg: clearing forested land for agriculture).

Comparing Apples to Oranges

After setting out to find a victor of older forests or

younger forests as better for carbon sequestration

and fighting climate change, I realized this is too

complex an equation to arrive at a finite answer, and

the answer lies in the realm of “it depends” and “if you

only consider.” In some ways this question cannot be

answered because we are comparing apples to oranges.

There is so much of the forest ecosystem that changes

in a managed or commercial forest that trying to assess

carbon sequestration based on the trees alone misses

the mark.

Young forests, and many of those studied to support

this research, tend to occur in areas that have been

commercial forests for decades. Whereas, older forests

tend to occur on conserved lands with a history of

conservation that preserves natural processes. The

variation on the soil microbiome, forest heterogeneity,

history of natural disturbance or not, and latitude

all play a role in shaping how and for how long

a forest will sequester carbon. From the lens of

conservation, older forests play an important role in

both sequestering carbon and conserving habitat.

Commercial forests also sequester carbon, perhaps at

a faster rate but over a shorter period than conserved

forests. Which is better? Well…

Mahoosuc Land Trust Plays Lead Role in

Nationally Recognized Carbon Project

MLT and Loon Echo Land Trust (LELT) teamed up

recently to be the first in a national program designed

to demonstrate how a land trust can aggregate its

holdings with those of other land trusts to access

voluntary carbon offset markets. Through a program

developed by the Land Trust Alliance and Finite

Carbon, MLT and LELT are now able to receive

compensation for increasing or maintaining carbon

stocks on their forested lands relative to baseline

levels.

As more fully described in the cover story of the

national publication below, MLT will be storing

more carbon on its lands and at the same time

gaining access to revenues that will enable further

conservation of important forest land and habitat.

The full article can be read by following the QR code

below or by visiting

www.landtrustalliance.org/resources/learn/explore/

Photo Credit: Jerry Monkman/Ecophotography

New board member Karen Burns

New board member Helen Durkin

New MLT Board Members Bring Organizational Leadership Experience

Following U.S. presidential inaugural poet Richard

Blanco’s reading at the 2023 Annual Meeting, MLT

formally recognized six departing board members

before the membership voted in the new board.

Departing president Laurie Winsor thanked Steve

Smith, Sara Shifrin, Bob Iles, Cassie Mason, and

Glenn Saller for their enormous collective impact on

MLT and the region. Board member Bonnie Pooley

presented the Bruce and Becky Bailey Award to Laurie,

in recognition of the leadership that she has provided

to MLT over these years of transition and growth.

MLT’s two new board members, Helen Durkin

and Karen Burns, bring exceptional organizational

experience and leadership. Helen is an attorney

and was a nonprofit executive with over 30 years of

experience developing and achieving organizational

strategic goals, establishing high-performing teams,

and building internal and external coalitions. She

led global policy and communications campaigns

to get people more active and developed grant and

major-donor campaigns to fund those efforts. Helen

has been consulting with MLT as a volunteer on

developing the Habitat for All initiative, serving on the

Valentine Farm Committee on other special projects,

and working in the Habitat Garden. Helen and her

husband Mark split their time between Medway, MA,

and Bethel. She has two daughters and a crazy springer

spaniel. Helen is obsessed with gardening, supporting

natural habitats, skiing, biking, and being active.

Karen Burns is currently the Assistant Head of

School for Advancement for Gould Academy. She

leads the efforts in fundraising, as well as alumni,

community and family relations. She came to Gould

after working for 9 years at the Island Institute, the

nonprofit community development organization

in Rockland, ME. As the Chief Leadership Officer,

Karen worked with community leaders, designed and

facilitated professional development, and managed

a portfolio of major donors. Prior to working at the

Island Institute, she was an English and Theater teacher

for 10 years on Vinalhaven Island. Karen has an

undergraduate degree in English and Psychology from

Amherst College and a Masters degree in Teaching

from the University of Maine. She lives in Bethel with

her husband Bruce, son Brandon, daughter Natalie,

and an active Shepherd mix named Ollie.

Richard Blanco read poems

about connections to place,

belonging, and community at

the 2023 Annual Meeting

The iconic granite face of Buck’s Ledge, which rises

from the eastern shore of North Pond in Woodstock,

is a magnet for hikers, artists and photographers.

The Buck’s Ledge Community Forest, created in 2022

thanks to the generous support of many donors and

funders, is now owned and managed by the Town

of Woodstock. Mahoosuc Land Trust holds the

conservation easement which ensures permanent

protection of this community jewel.

Buck’s Ledge Community Forest Day, organized by

the Woodstock Conservation Commission and MLT,

recognizes recent developments at Buck’s. Many may

already be familiar with its traditional recreational uses

which now include trails connecting Lapham Ledge

and the summit of Moody Mountain. Rare plants,

old growth trees, six distinct bat species, and nesting

peregrine falcons await the intrepid visitor.

This year we will celebrate the creation of the

Summit For All scenic outlook, with remarks from

special guest Enock Glidden, founder of Outside for

All. Enock is an athlete with a serious disability (Spina

Bifida), an adventurer with a spirit for life, an engaging

motivational speaker and a dedicated advocate for

others with disabilities. Enock inspires people of all

abilities to try new things. His presence is only one

aspect of the Access for All theme of this year’s Forest

Day. Another is the plan to create a nearly 1 mile

long wheelchair-accessible Trail for All. It will lead in

two directions from the accessible parking at the log

landing. One will lead to the Summit for All, the other

will meander around and through a meadow into the

forest before returning to the starting point. Come

and learn how you can help us make this Trail for All a

reality in 2024.

At the conclusion of the program we will celebrate

with our tradition of floating giant bubbles from the

Summit For All scenic outlook. Please come and

experience the beauty of Buck’s Ledge during peak fall

foliage.

The event officially begins at 2 p.m. on Saturday,

October 14th. Parking will be on a first come basis

in the Buck’s Ledge parking lot, and along Mills Road

on the other side of Route 26. It is a half mile walk

on the access road from the Buck’s parking lot to the

Summit For All scenic outlook. A bus will be available

to shuttle those who need assistance or feel they would

like a ride. Vehicles with disability plates or wheel chair

lifts are permitted to use the access road. Please allow

time to get to the Summit For All by 2 PM.

The Town of Woodstock’s August 2022 acquisition

of this property was a historic achievement for the

community. Funds were raised in a remarkably

short time–just over a year–thanks to a synergy

of partnerships including Mahoosuc Land Trust,

Northern Forest Center, and Forest Society of Maine,

with the leadership of the Woodstock Conservation

Commission (WCC). The project inspired wide-

reaching support among our communities, exceeding

the local fundraising goal of $175,000, with more than

270 people contributing.

The Buck’s Ledge acquisition project has also

inspired art from young people. Students of Melissa

Prescott’s community art class designed and

constructed four unique benches that have been placed

along the trail network. In addition, Telstar Middle

School art students conducted and recorded interviews

with a diverse group of four individuals relating to

Buck’s Ledge. These records are archived at the Bethel

Historical Society.

Celebrate the Second Annual Buck’s Ledge Community

Forest Day on Saturday, October 14th!

Board of Directors

President

Sue Dunn, Bethel

Vice-President

Mia Purcell, Bryant Pond

Secretary

Bonnie Pooley, Gilead

Treasurer

David MacMahon, Poland

Board Members

Amy Halsted, Bethel

Art Marshall, Albany

Bill White, Woodstock

Karen Burns, Bethel

James Reddoch, Medford, MA

John Wholey, Bethel

Katie Stuart, Shelburne, NH

Larry Ely, Shelburne, NH

Lizz Peacock, Newry

Helen Durkin, Medway, MA

Executive Director

Kirk Siegel, Albany

Development Director

Barbara Murphy, W. Paris

Land Steward

Spenser Williams, Bethel

Membership and Outreach

Manager Becca Hoskins, Bethel

PO Box 981

Bethel, ME 04217

www.mahoosuc.org

NON-PROFIT

BULK RATE

U.S. POSTAGE

PAID

BETHEL, ME

PERMIT #18

Support the businesses that support the Land Trust. To become a business member or

business partner, visit our webpage: www.mahoosuc.org/become-a-business-member

Editing and design: Becca Hoskins

Our Business Partners:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Made with Publuu - flipbook maker